Comments on: A Critique of David R. Hawkins and Kinesiology

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:07:00 +0000

It is funny how almost all the critics have never met Dr. Hawkins and always take some quote totally out of context changing the whole meaning. The quote is never referenced and when you do find it you find that the paragraphs preceding or following the quote totally change the context. Dr. Hawkins has also said that only 30%+- of the population in the US can actually do muscle testing. If you are going to quote somebody at least give the references.

By: Anagram Day

Anagram Day — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 04:23:00 +0000

Note that Dr. Hawkins no longer uses the term ‘kinesiology’ to refer to his practice of muscle testing.

By: a kinesiology practitioner

a kinesiology practitioner — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:39:00 +0000

Hawkins use of muscle testing to calibrate people and documents is totally inappropriate and unprofessional. Hawkings misrepresents the technique. Muscle testing as used by kinesiology practitioners is for detecting stress in the patient, be it structural and physical, nutritional and chemical, mental and emotional stress. The muscle test is done in a clinical context and used to guide the practitioner and help the patient to wellness. Any other conclusion such as Hawkings conclusions of the vibration of historical figures and documents are really the stress that person had on the subject when Hawkins did the test. Any thing else is an assumption. And yes, there actually are practitioners who train in this health modaility.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 May 2011 15:14:00 +0000

It may be that context and net result, rather than individual level, is what’s being calibrated. Of course, it might also be that the technique doesn’t work. It ought to be easy to prove one way or another, but I fear that anyone attempting to validate it who’s results were negative would be accused of being at too low a level to do the calibration.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:00 +0000

The book, as discussed above, is “I- Reality and Subjectivity”, and the quote is several chapters in. It quite definitely says “The Constitution”, not the Declaration of Independence. I don’t have the book with me, but I believe you’ll find the remark easy to locate in that book.

By: Rosesnow

Rosesnow — Tue, 10 May 2011 11:22:00 +0000

It my is my understand that Doctor Hawkins refered to the Declaration of Independence when referring to the mention of the word God being included (Truth v Falsehood). Could you please tell me where Doc Hawkins says the word God is included in the constitution?

By: Rosesnowuk

Rosesnowuk — Tue, 10 May 2011 11:07:00 +0000

In regard to comments on the calibration of Chamberlain and Churchill, the writer fails to take ‘context’ into consideration: a rather serious flaw. The calibration results may be due to the overall effect on the greater good of Churchill’s life, and that of Chamberlain. Blessing on your journey brother, Rose

By: S. Settle

S. Settle — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:08:00 +0000

Here is another test: Muscle test while looking at Dr. David Hawkins to see if he tests strong. Then look in the mirror and test your self. Then call to God or say some praise of God and test yourself again, while looking in the mirror. Are you strong yet?

I did this very same test and Dr. Hawkins always tests strong, I only test strong, while looking in a mirror, when I am saying God’s name or a prayer. Those with Alzheimers test strong…of the two I tested. It is very interesting. Some children test strong and very few adults. All dogs and cats and some birds tested strong. One can just think of a name of a real person or his/her face and test. All or almost all test weak. Thnk maybe the ones testing strong are innocent and loving may be the ones testing strong?

God bless us all, SS

By: Jake01

Jake01 — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:39:00 +0000

First you need to decide what your aim is?
Do you want to get to Heaven (540) if so continue helping people and trying to change the world.
Do you want to attain enlightenment?
If so forget the world and all your positionalities on how You (ego) think it should be.

As for the trying to guess what peoples calibrations should be it is worthwhile to remember that it is a combination of their intention and the truth they have uncovered about themselves.

Remember the Pope can calibrate in the high 500′s yet the catholic church’s stance on pedophilia is in the 100′s.
So Winston Churchill may appear to be quite negative or have bad traits when his Will is on the correct path to bettering mankind – see Perception Vs Essence.

It serves well to remain humble and accept ones shortcomings – I realize and accept that I am unable to see or understand anyone who calibrates above me – if I could understand and see their position I would be at their level or higher.

As for the Doc’s calibrations I treat them as interesting and accept they are ballpark figures that are generally true – I get far more out of the the talks on Divinity as source.

Regards, Jake.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:42:00 +0000

Hawkins meant the Pledge of Alliegance, not the Constitution. Adding “under God” in 1954 does change its vibration from 485 to 705.

Regarding Churchill, a vibration above 500 does not mean a person is PERFECT, but he certainly had the skills required to lead his country during the war. He was of course defeated in the postwar election, perhaps due to certain of his personal shortcomings.

People who vibrate above 700 are in the realm of enlightenment and may be judged by a higher standard.

Reverend, you see merit in Hawkins, then dismiss it all based on one inaccuracy and one misunderstanding.

Dr Hawkins presents his world view without sugar-coating and I believe it is a great revelation for people who sincerely seek truth.