<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PathsToKnowledge.com &#187; Mystic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathstoknowledge.com/tag/mystic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com</link>
	<description>Your map to happiness and personal growth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Mystic and the Esoteric</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com/519/the-mystic-and-the-esoteric/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-mystic-and-the-esoteric</link>
		<comments>http://pathstoknowledge.com/519/the-mystic-and-the-esoteric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirituality Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esoteric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.com/2009/02/18/the-mystic-and-the-esoteric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had mentioned in one of my posts earlier the categories &#8220;mystic&#8221; and &#8220;esoteric&#8221;, and that there is a distinct difference between them. I ran into this distinction in a really excellent book by Richard Smoley titled &#8220;Inner Christianity&#8220;. Since the distinction is his I&#8217;d best let him clarify it: Esotericism is characterized by an <a href='http://pathstoknowledge.com/519/the-mystic-and-the-esoteric/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pathstoknowledge.com/519/the-mystic-and-the-esoteric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering That We Have Forgotten</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com/229/remembering-that-we-have-forgotten/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=remembering-that-we-have-forgotten</link>
		<comments>http://pathstoknowledge.com/229/remembering-that-we-have-forgotten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirituality Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.com/229/remembering-that-we-have-forgotten/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have all read in scientific books, and, indeed, in all romances, the story of the man who has forgotten his name. This man walks about the streets and can see and appreciate everything; only he cannot remember who he is. Well, every man is that man in the story. Every man has forgotten who he is. One may understand the cosmos, but never the ego; the self more distant than any star. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God; but thou shalt not know thyself. We are all under the same mental calamity; we have all forgotten our names. We have all forgotten what we really are. All that we call common sense and rationality and practicality and positivism only means that for certain dead levels of our life we forget that we have forgotten. All that we call spirit and art and ecstasy only means that for one awful instant we remember that we forget.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pathstoknowledge.com/229/remembering-that-we-have-forgotten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Philosophy of Oops&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com/228/the-philosophy-of-oops/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-philosophy-of-oops</link>
		<comments>http://pathstoknowledge.com/228/the-philosophy-of-oops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirituality Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.com/228/the-philosophy-of-oops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ken Wilber [img_assist&#124;nid=5&#124;title=Ken Wilber&#124;desc=Ken Wilber&#124;link=node&#124;align=right&#124;width=92&#124;height=100]</p><p>It is flat-out strange that something - that anything - is happening at all. There was nothing, then a Big Bang, then here we all are. This is extremely weird. </p><p>To Schelling’s burning question, “Why is there something rather than nothing?,” there have always been two general answers. The first might be called the philosophy of “oops.” The universe just occurs, there is nothing behind it, it’s all ultimately accidental or random, it just is, it just happens - oops! The philosophy of oops, no matter how sophisticated and adult it may on occasion appear - its modern names and numbers are legion, from positivism to scientific materialism, from linguistic analysis to historical materialism, from naturalism to empiricism - always comes down to the same basic answer, namely, “Don’t ask.” </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pathstoknowledge.com/228/the-philosophy-of-oops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Who Are You?</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com/224/so-who-are-you/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=so-who-are-you</link>
		<comments>http://pathstoknowledge.com/224/so-who-are-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirituality Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.com/224/so-who-are-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>by Ken Wilber </p> <p>The witnessing of awareness can persist through waking, dreaming and deep sleep. The Witness is fully available in any state, including your own present state of awareness right now. So I’m going to talk you into this state, or try to, using what are known in Buddhism as “pointing out instructions.” I am not going to try to get you into a different state of consciousness, or an altered state of consciousness, or a non-ordinary state. I am going to simply point out something that is already occurring in your own present, ordinary, natural state. So let’s start by just being aware of the world around us. Look out there at the sky, and just relax your mind; let your mind and the sky mingle. Notice the clouds floating by. Notice that this takes no effort on your part. Your present awareness, in which these clouds are floating, is very simple, very easy, effortless, spontaneous. You simply notice that there is an effortless awareness of the clouds. The same is true of those trees, and those birds, and those rocks. You simply and effortlessly witness them. Look now at the sensations in your own body. You can be aware of whatever bodily feelings are present-perhaps pressure where you are sitting, perhaps warmth in your tummy, maybe tightness in your neck. But even if these feelings are tight and tense, you can easily be aware of them. These feelings arise in your present awareness, and that awareness is very simple, easy, effortless, spontaneous. You simply and effortlessly witness them. Look at the thoughts arising in your mind. You might notice various images, symbols, concepts, desires, hopes and fears, all spontaneously arising in your awareness. They arise, stay a bit, and pass. These thoughts and feelings arise in your present awareness, and that awareness is very simple, effortless, spontaneous. You simply and effortlessly witness them. So notice: you can see the clouds float by because you are not those clouds-you are the witness of those clouds. You can feel bodily feelings because you are not those feelings-you are the witness of those feelings. You can see thoughts float by because you are not those thoughts-you are the witness of those thoughts. Spontaneously and naturally, these things all arise, on their own, in your present, effortless awareness. So who are you? You are not objects out there, you are not feelings, you are not thoughts-you are effortlessly aware of all those, so you are not those. Who or what are you? Say it this way to yourself: I have feelings, but I am not those feelings. Who am I? I have thoughts, but I am not those thoughts. Who am I? I have desires, but I am not those desires. Who am I? So you push back into the source of your own awareness. You push back into the Witness, and you rest in the Witness. I am not objects, not feelings, not desires, not thoughts. But then people usually make a big mistake. They think that if they rest in the Witness, they are going to see something or feel something-something really neat and special. But you won’t see anything. If you see something, that is just another object-another feeling, another thought, another sensation, another image. But those are all objects; those are what you are not. No, as you rest in the Witness-realizing, I am not objects, I am not feelings, I am not thoughts-all you will notice is a sense of freedom, a sense of liberation, a sense of release-release from the terrible constriction of identifying with these puny little finite objects, your little body and little mind and little ego, all of which are objects that can be seen, and thus are not the true Seer, the real Self, the pure Witness, which is what you really are. So you won’t see anything in particular. Whatever is arising is fine. Clouds float by in the sky, feelings float by in the body, thoughts float by in the mind-and you can effortlessly witness all of them. They all spontaneously arise in your own present, easy, effortless awareness. And this witnessing awareness is not itself anything specific you can see. It is just a vast, background sense of freedom-or pure emptiness-and in that pure emptiness, which you are, the entire manifest world arises. You are that freedom, openness, emptiness-and not any itty bitty thing that arises in it. Resting in that empty, free, easy, effortless witnessing, notice that the clouds are arising in the vast space of your awareness. The clouds are arising within you-so much so, you can taste the clouds, you are one with the clouds. It is as if they are on this side of your skin, they are so close. The sky and your awareness have become one, and all things in the sky are floating effortlessly through your own awareness. You can kiss the sun, swallow the mountain, they are that close. Zen says “Swallow the Pacific Ocean in a single gulp,” and that’s the easiest thing in the world, when inside and outside are no longer two, when subject and object are nondual, when the looker and looked at are One Taste. You see? </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pathstoknowledge.com/224/so-who-are-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Theory of Everything &#8211; Ken Wilber</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.com/221/a-theory-of-everything-ken-wilber/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-theory-of-everything-ken-wilber</link>
		<comments>http://pathstoknowledge.com/221/a-theory-of-everything-ken-wilber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirituality Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Wilber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.com/221/a-theory-of-everything-ken-wilber/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From “A Theory of Everything” by Ken Wilber </p> <p>“M-Theory has certainly got intellectuals thinking; that is, thinking differently. What would it mean if there were a theory that explained EVERYTHING? And just what does “everything” actually mean, anyway? Would this new theory in physics explain, say, the meaning of human poetry? Or how economics works? Or the stages of psycho-sexual development? Can this new physics explain the currents of ecosystems, of the dynamics of history, or why human wars are so terribly common? </p> <p>In the interior of quarks, it is said, there are vibrating strings, and these strings are the fundamental units of everything. Well, if so, it is a strange everything, pale and anemic and alien to the richness of the world that daily presents itself to you and me. Clearly strings are an important PART of a larger world, fundamental to it, but not that significant, it seems. You and I already know that strings, should they exist, are only a tiny part of the picture, and we know this every time we look around, listen to Bach, make love, are caught transfixed at the sharp crack of thunder, sit rapturous at sunset, contemplate a radiant world that seems made of something so much more than microscopic, one-dimensional, tiny rubber bands… </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pathstoknowledge.com/221/a-theory-of-everything-ken-wilber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

